ScribeFlash

Evidence-linked AI

Evidence-linked AI for research analysis

ScribeFlash helps researchers move from raw interview transcripts to findings that remain traceable. Suggested themes, contradictions, and report claims keep a reference to the source quote, transcript segment, timestamp, participant, and research question.

  • Every finding links back to source evidence
  • AI suggestions stay marked until reviewed
  • Quotes can travel into editable reports
Start a research project

Evidence-linked AI

ScribeFlash

Verified flow
1

Every finding links back to source evidence

2

AI suggestions stay marked until reviewed

3

Quotes can travel into editable reports

How ScribeFlash keeps AI analysis grounded in evidence

The product is designed for UX researchers, product managers, and consultants who need interview insights they can verify before sharing with clients or teams.

Evidence starts from an exact transcript selection

When a researcher highlights text, ScribeFlash stores the source segment, timestamp, speaker, interview, and nearby context. The original transcript remains available even when a highlight is deleted.

  • Segment-level source reference
  • Timestamp and speaker context
  • Highlight deletion does not remove the transcript

Research coding is attached to the evidence

Evidence can carry multiple tags and one primary research question, so AI analysis stays aligned with the study goal instead of turning interviews into a generic meeting summary.

  • Tags for themes, pain points, and behaviors
  • Primary research-question mapping
  • Research notes alongside the quote

AI suggestions are separated from confirmed findings

ScribeFlash can suggest useful evidence and findings, but suggested content is labeled until a researcher confirms, edits, merges, or rejects it.

  • Suggested status is visible
  • Researchers make the final call
  • Edits remain part of the review workflow

Findings can include support and counter-evidence

A strong finding is not just a polished sentence. It can include supporting evidence, counter-evidence, confidence, and limitations so minority views are not hidden as noise.

  • Supporting quote references
  • Counter-evidence references
  • Limitations suitable for reports

From quote to evidence-linked report

The evidence workflow is intentionally simple: capture the quote, connect it to the research question, let AI suggest patterns, then decide what belongs in the report.

1

Highlight a quote

Select text in the transcript and create evidence with the exact source segment and timestamp.

2

Code the evidence

Add tags, research-question mapping, and notes so the quote has analytical meaning.

3

Review AI suggestions

Evaluate suggested evidence, themes, contradictions, and confidence before accepting anything.

4

Insert into report

Move confirmed findings and quotes into an editable report while preserving evidence references.

Trust controls

Built to reduce AI hallucination in research deliverables

The product design treats AI as an assistant, not an invisible author. Evidence references, confidence, and limitations help teams review the chain from transcript to final claim.

Traceability

A finding should be able to point back to quote, segment, participant, and interview context.

Human review

Suggested evidence and findings are not mixed with confirmed researcher decisions.

Report integrity

When a finding enters the report builder, the EvidenceReference remains attached for later verification.

Frequently asked questions

What is evidence-linked AI?

Evidence-linked AI means AI-generated findings are connected to the interview evidence behind them: source quotes, transcript segments, timestamps, participants, and research questions.

How is this different from a normal AI summary?

A normal AI summary can be hard to verify. ScribeFlash is designed so each important claim can be checked against the original interview evidence before it reaches a report.

Can AI overwrite the original transcript?

No. The product design keeps original transcript content separate from cleaned, translated, anonymized, or AI-assisted versions, so edits and derived content do not silently replace the source.

What happens when I delete a highlight?

Deleting a highlight removes the research coding for that highlight. It does not delete the original transcript text.

Can a report citation jump back to the source?

Yes. Findings and quotes are designed to keep EvidenceReferences so a reader can trace them back to the underlying quote, timestamp, segment, and interview.

Explore the rest of the research workflow

Need interview findings you can actually defend?

Create a project, upload interviews, and keep every important insight connected to source evidence.

Start a research project
Evidence-Linked AI for Research Analysis | ScribeFlash